Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Fusobacterium nucleatumÀÇ Å×Æ®¶ó»çÀÌŬ¸° ³»¼º¿©ºÎ¸¦ °Ë»çÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ¼¼±Õ¹è¾ç¹ý°ú ÁßÇÕÈ¿¼Ò¿¬¼â¹ÝÀÀ¹ýÀÇ ºñ±³

Comparison of cultural method and PCR method for the assay of tetracycline-resistant Fusobacterium cleatum isolated in Korean

´ëÇѱ¸°­º¸°ÇÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 27±Ç 4È£ p.581 ~ 589
ÃÖÀçÈï, ÀåÇö±Ô, ¼ºÁøÈ¿, À̼ø·Ê,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÀçÈï (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡Çб³½Ç
ÀåÇö±Ô (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­»ýÈ­Çб³½Ç
¼ºÁøÈ¿ (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡Çб³½Ç
À̼ø·Ê (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The purposes of this study were to identify the detection and incidence of tetracycline resistance determinant tet(M) by PCR method and to evaluate the availability of PCR method guided for clinical use of antibiotics in dentistry. Subgingival plaque samples were collected from 172 sites of 29 patients. Both original sample and subcultured sample, PCR amplification was used to detect tet(M) in Fusobacterium nucleatum. The percentage of tet(M)-positive subjects and sites¢¥ in original samples were 100%, 95.9%, respectively. And the percentage of tet(M)-positive subjects and sites in subcultured samples were 17.2%, 3.5%, respectively. In subcultured samples, probing pocket depth and clinical attachment level in tet(M)positive sites were higher than in negative sites (p < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of PCR method compared with broth dilution method as a gold standard were 0.91 and 0.86, respectively. The results suggested that tet(M) assay using PCR method was available to detect the tetracycline-resistant F. nucleatum

Å°¿öµå

Fusobacterium nucleatum;Å×Æ®¶ó»çÀÌŬ¸°³»¼º;¼¼±Õ¹è¾ç¹ý;ÁßÇÕÈ¿¼Ò¿¬¼â¹ÝÀÀ¹ý;Cultural method;PCR method;tetracycline-resistant

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed